New Legislation to Affect Landlords in the UK, but How Much...


Share

I have just read both sides of the debate over the government's new legislation pertaining to the private rental sector and landlord licensing.

The Landlord and BTL blog says this is a government war on landlords as Labour shows its true colours of landlord hatred in the hope of winning the votes of the masses at the expense of the few, the author writes:

"They [Labour] don't like landlords and want to beat us into submission with legislation. Why? Because it's good for us! Because it's good for communities, society, tenants. No! What it's really about is the fact that they can say to the electorate that they are doing something and hope to snatch the odd vote from poorly informed tenants and Labour supporters who love to see landlords get a good kicking!"

On the other hand Inside Housing says it is simply an attempt by the government to lessen the impact of sub-standard housing within the community, quoting housing minister John Healey as saying:

"Everyone deserves a decent and safe place to live and these measures aim to improve standards of the private rented sector at a time when more people look to rent as their first option in the housing market."

Before I wade in I'll briefly explain what the legislation is:

Firstly: the Department for Communities and Local Government is to give local councils the power to set up landlord licensing programs without central government permission, in areas where there are lots of substandard properties.

Secondly: the law regarding Houses with Multiple Occupants (HMOs) is to be changed; from April any landlord wanting to turn a house into an HMO will have to seek planning permission in order to do so.

Now, I suppose I should really be careful here with so landlords on my follower's list, but we all know I'm not gonna do that. I am forced to say that the Landlord and BTL blog author is overreacting a bit on this occasion.

Firstly, the licensing schemes:

In the locality in which I live, one cannot be a window cleaner without having a licence, for which you pay almost £200 and have to be vetted by the police.

Landlords can have a massive impact on people's lives, it is only right that there should be some kind of controls in place. It is easy for landlords to baulk at such legislation, but we all know that there are some really nasty and irresponsible people in this world, and when that sort of person becomes a landlord he/she can do some real damage to people's mental state, mental health and even physical health.

This is especially worth bearing in mind now, with so many people being forced into rented accommodation because they couldn't afford to keep their house, or worse: lost it to repossession. This I suspect is the reasoning behind the legislation.

Looking at it from that angle responsible landlords with nothing to worry about or hide, will I'm sure either support the legislation or at the very least understand why it is necessary (let's hope it is that group mostly following me or I may just regret writing this post).

Onto the HMO planning permission:

This I also support for pretty much the same reason; an irresponsible landlord with little compassion or even consideration for those unfortunate enough to be his tenants, deciding to go HMO because it will increase his returns is an absolute recipe for disaster, and one which again endangers people's safety. At least if planning permission is sought, at least the properties will be safe and properly thought out.

On the other hand, maybe the planning permission is just another example of the big brother state going too far. That said: one cannot build an extension or garage without planning permission, why is that, for people's safety? So if this is the case then doing something that will involve more people's safety should have the get the plan association nod, shouldn't it?.

Update from Nick @pimlico_flats: "A lot of the angst [among landlords] comes from a tighter definition of licensable HMO, changing from 5 persons in a 3 storey house, to 3 persons."

Thanks Nick, I did not know that, and I can see why that would cause anger.

Like this post? Subscribe to our feed by RSS or Email, join our newsletter(s) or leave a comment using the form below.

By Liam Bailey - 2010-01-30 21:11:26

Buy articles button Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Bookmark and Share Bookmark and Share Add to Mixx!

Leave a Comment on this Post

Filed under: UK Property, Opinion Articles

Tagged: Landlords | Buy to Let | BigBrother State | DCLG | Government | Housing Legislation |

About the Author: Liam Bailey

Liam is the director of SEO Copywriting Services company Write About Property.

View all UK Property ArticlesSubscribe to UK property articles feedUK property articles by Email

View all ArticlesSubscribe to Write About Property articles feedAll Write About Property Articles by Email

 
Have Your Say - Post a Comment

captch image

Comment By: Sharon

Date: 2010-01-30 21:15:56

Comment:
Hi Liam,
I was very pleased to read your views on landlord licencing as I believe that a basic licence is essential to get all landlords out in the open. Currently the initial Rugg Review proposals seem to have been scrapped, with the NLA and the RLA resistant to the government's proposals which took licencing much further. The PRS and the leasehold sector are inextricably linked as one has freehold landords and the other has rental landlords. I cannot help but continue to think that the lack of visibility along with the voluntary element of joining any organisation or gaining accreditation is the weak foundation on which the ignorant and the unscrupulous are happy to exploit, leaving a market of reluctant tenants and leaseholders forced to take over management.

I have no idea if and when we will get a licencing scheme in place and the arguement seems constantly to be that it will not prevent rogue operators but this is the point: they will no longer be able to hide behind a cloak of anonymity!

Kind Regards
Sharon
Leasehold Life

Comment By: Nick Parkin

Date: 2010-01-30 21:15:56

Comment:
Great Blog, I like it. However I do think that you need to mention that a lot of the angst comes from a tighter definition of licensable HMO, changing from 5 persons in a 3 storey house, to 3 persons.

Your Ad Here

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

By Rss
feed icon

Sponsors



Socialise with Us

Facebook fan page

Links

Latest Posts

UK Housing Market: No One Wants to be a First Time Buyer

Turkey Standing out as Brightest Emerging Market in Europe

The Overseas Property Investment Crash: Where it all Went Wrong

UK House Prices: Can We Really Avoid a Second Dip?

Turkish C.Bank Keeps Interest Rate at Current Low

Property in Spain August 2010: Is it Time to Buy Yet?

Bad Year Leads to High Availability of Cheap Holiday Deals

Turkish Air Travel Growth Continues Apace

Turkish Property has Potential to be as Popular as Europe's Greats

Emerging Property Markets 2010 Part I: Egypt and Turkey

Related Posts

UK Housing Market: No One Wants to be a First Time Buyer

UK House Prices: Can We Really Avoid a Second Dip?

Second Dip in UK House Prices to be a Long One Says PWC

It Does Not Look Good for UK House Prices

Will New Govt Affect UK House Prices?

UK House Price Rises – Unsustainable or Flipping Great?

Mortgages Up but Still Subdued, UK House Prices Teetering on the Brink?

UK GDP Q1 Growth 0.7% Quarterly and 0.3% Annually

UK House Prices Shaky as Election Fears Push up Supply

Mortgages Fall by Half in Jan, Another Nail in UK House Prices' Coffin?

Sponsored Links